Understanding AI Agents
Understanding AI Agents
Candidate Audit uses six specialized AI agents to provide comprehensive, multi-dimensional candidate evaluation. Each agent brings a unique perspective to the hiring decision.
Why Six Agents?
Hiring decisions are complex and multifaceted. A single evaluation perspective can miss critical insights. Our six-agent system ensures:
- Comprehensive coverage: Every important aspect is evaluated
- Balanced perspective: Multiple viewpoints prevent bias
- Deeper insights: Specialized focus reveals details generalists miss
- Transparent reasoning: See exactly why each score was given
The Six Agents
1. The Pragmatist
Focus: Practical skills and real-world experience
Evaluates:
- Hands-on technical abilities
- Track record of delivered results
- Relevant industry experience
- Ability to hit the ground running
Best for: Roles requiring immediate productivity and proven expertise.
2. The Visionary
Focus: Strategic thinking and future potential
Evaluates:
- Big-picture thinking ability
- Innovation and creative problem-solving
- Growth trajectory and ambition
- Alignment with company vision
Best for: Leadership roles and positions requiring strategic insight.
3. The Investigator
Focus: Verification and consistency
Evaluates:
- Resume accuracy and consistency
- Timeline coherence
- Claims verification
- Red flag detection
Best for: Ensuring candidate integrity and spotting potential issues.
4. The Culture Vulture
Focus: Cultural fit and team alignment
Evaluates:
- Values alignment with company culture
- Work style and team dynamics
- Communication approach
- Adaptability to company environment
Best for: Ensuring long-term retention and team harmony.
5. The Devil's Advocate
Focus: Critical analysis and risk assessment
Evaluates:
- Potential weaknesses and gaps
- Risk factors in hiring this candidate
- Areas requiring further investigation
- Counterarguments to positive signals
Best for: Balanced decision-making and avoiding costly hiring mistakes.
6. The Strategist
Focus: Long-term organizational impact
Evaluates:
- Career trajectory fit with company needs
- Potential for internal advancement
- Skills that complement existing team
- Strategic value to organization
Best for: Building teams with long-term vision in mind.
How Agents Work Together
Independent Analysis
Each agent evaluates the candidate separately, preventing groupthink and ensuring diverse perspectives.
Consensus Building
After independent analysis, agents identify:
- Strong consensus: All agents agree (high confidence signal)
- Moderate agreement: Most agents align (typical scenario)
- Split opinions: Agents disagree (requires deeper investigation)
Weighted Contribution
Based on your campaign settings, you can adjust which agents matter most for specific roles.
Agent Scoring System
Each agent provides:
- Numerical Score: 0-100 scale
- Written Assessment: Detailed reasoning
- Key Strengths: Top 3-5 positive signals
- Areas of Concern: Potential issues identified
- Recommendation: Hire, consider, or pass
Score Ranges
- 90-100: Exceptional match for this agent's criteria
- 75-89: Strong match with minor reservations
- 60-74: Adequate match with notable concerns
- 40-59: Poor match with significant issues
- 0-39: Critical mismatch for this agent's focus area
Reading Agent Assessments
Overall Pattern
Look for:
- All high scores: Strong candidate across all dimensions
- Mix of high and moderate: Good candidate with specific strengths
- One low outlier: Investigate that specific concern area
- Multiple low scores: Likely not a good fit
Agent-Specific Insights
Don't just look at numbers—read the reasoning:
- Why did The Investigator flag this issue?
- What did The Visionary see in this candidate's potential?
- Why is The Culture Vulture concerned about fit?
Customizing Agent Importance
Different roles require different agent emphasis:
Technical IC role: Pragmatist (high), Visionary (low), Investigator (medium)
Leadership role: Visionary (high), Strategist (high), Culture Vulture (high)
High-risk hire: Investigator (high), Devil's Advocate (high)
Adjust weights in campaign settings to match your needs.
Next Steps
- Request an assessment for your candidates
- Learn to interpret results effectively
- Explore agent-specific insights in detail
Key Takeaway
Don't rely on overall score alone. The richest insights come from reading what each agent says and understanding where they agree and disagree. Use the six agents as your hiring advisory board.